Pteris vittata L.

  • Filed As

    Pteridaceae
    Pteris vittata L.

  • Collector(s)

    E. D. Merrill 167, Nov 1914

  • Location

    Philippines. Rizal. Antipolo.

  • Identifiers

    NY Barcode: 3943374

    Occurrence ID: 4b705c3b-39bf-4717-b16b-f3c552537d45

  • Feedback

    Send comments on this specimen record

  • Kingdom

    Plantae

  • Division

    Pteridophyta

  • Order

    Polypodiales

  • Family

    Pteridaceae

  • All Determinations

    Pteris vittata L.

    No botanical uses.

^/o-rifäh
fil ?J
MEUHILLi
SPECIES ULANCOANAE NO. Hq7
167* Fterle longifolia I,inn,
Adlantu® lance a Blanoo, non L.
Pterl® trichosjanoides Blaaoo
non linn«	*
PTERIS Linnaeus
Adlantum lancea Blanco FI. Filip. (1837) 833, ed. 2 (1845) 576, ed. 3, 3
(1879) 250, non Linn. nec. Bak.=PTERIS VITTATA Linn. (P. longi-
folia Auct., non Linn.).
Pterls trlchomanoides Blanco op. cit. 830; 574 ; 247, non Linn.= PTERIS
VITTATA Linn. (P. longifolia Auct., non Linn.).
Pterls grandifolia Blanco op. cit. 829; 574; 246, non Linn.=? PTERIS
VITTATA Linn. (P. longifolia Auct., non Linn.).
Adiantum lancea Blanco was reduced by Fernandez-Villar to
Lindsaya ensifolia Sw.=Schizoloma ensifolium J. Sm., a species
that does not occur near Manila and one which is very rare in
the Philippines. The description is very poor, but so far as it
goes agrees fairly well with Pteris vittata Linn, which is common
in and about Manila and which is widely distributed in the Phil-
ippines ; Blanco’s specimens were "from Mandaloyon, a suburb
of Manila. Pteris tnchomanoides Blanco was reduced by F.-
Villar to Nephrolepis racemosa Moore, but from Blanco’s im-
perfect description it cannot possibly belong in Nephrolepis,
but is unquestionably Pteris vittata Linn. Pteris grandifolia
Blanco was reduced by F.-Villar to P. opaca J. Sm., which is
unquestionably an erroneous disposition of it. The name taga-
has, one of these cited by Blanco, is now used in parts of Cavite
Province, Luzon, to designate a species of Dryopteris of the D.
parasitica group. Blanco’s short description, however, applies
better to Pteris vittata Linn, than to any other species known
to me. This form appears in herbaria as Pteris longifolia Linn.,
but Hieronymus, Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Pteris,
I. über Pteris longifolia L. und verwandte Arten, ffedwigia 54
(1=913) 283-294, has shown that Pteris longifolia Linn/is a
species confined to tropical America, and that P. vittata Linn,
is the proper name for the very common and widely distributed
form in the Old Worl$.
Illustrative specimen from Antipolo, Rizal Province, Luzon,
November, 1914 (Merrill: Species Blancoanae No. 167).
NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN
03943374
03943374